if your Host is a game server for several game VMs, confirming that would take a lot of speculation away from the following? Here are a few comments for the conversial items: A lot of this is a matter of taste and a question of availability on each market place, also about how long you want to or can wait for getting all the parts. Thanks for taking real-world options into discussion. thanks for you help i know this is a bit confusing but id really appreciate any help so what i wanted to know is that since i have a low graphics card is this making my cpu work harder? do i need to upgrade my cpu or graphics card? or is it the cpu core count that limiting my cpu. ![]() Im only able to run around 4 VM with my ram usage being at 60% and cpu usage at 100%. Intel xeon E31220 3.10 ghz 4 core/4 thread Now where im a little bit confused is that when i run the vm on my current server which has the following specs He mentioned that for each VM he allocated around 2GB ram and hes able to run this without any problems Or just buy a near-best option and try out how many workstations you really need to achieve a satisfactory performance.Īnd also just for a bit of a comparison my friend bought a new pc and hes able to run 8 vms with this setup without any problems his specs are the following. If not obvious, you need to do a rather extensive price-performance-ratio analysis, based on some carefully planned tests. 8 is actually not enough for 8 VMs, because the Host needs CPU power, too. If your game is threaded, you can benefit from several cores per VM. There you have a 12 thread version available, which according to some tests is generally not that much better than 6 thread version, but in your case it just might be much better. In general, top of the line performance does NOT give the optimal price-performance ratio, it just gives the absolute best when a cheaper option is not enough to do the job. When using several workstations, also motherboard and RAM speed requirements wouldn't be that critical. Similarly, you would get more graphics power by using multiple workstations and the matter of distributing the graphics power to 8 VMs using hardware acceleration would ease up. I meant that you might get more CPU power by adding more threads by using more workstations compared to paying dearly for a top of the line CPU. You may also consider spreading the load on several workstations, which might be more cost efficient than paying extra for the top of the line cpu and graphics adapter.Īs a further clarification and one addition, if needed at all, the following: ![]() This is something that you need to try out as well, but probably your CPU must be as good as possible to achieve this - depending on the game, which I'm not familiar with. Safest bet would be that you could achieve 15-20 fps with a single core of CPU without graphics card acceleration. There you have to try it out or wait for advice from somebody else. ![]() I'm not sure what happens when you try to run several VMs with 15-20 fps with Hardware 3D acceleration at the same time, or even running 8 that way. That is a system that is achievable as a workstation, with workstation OS, in a reasonable price range. a few SSDs, spreading VMs on several SSDs I take it that you RUN at 15-20 fps all those VMs at the same time.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |